Sharon May Have Helped Create a Monster -- Israel's Settler Movement
Like the Golem of Jewish
legend, a peril has emerged that confronts its maker. Now the nation itself is
endangered.
By Uri Avnery, Uri Avnery is a founding member of Gush Shalom, an Israeli peace group founded in 1993.
In Jewish legend, the Golem was a
man-made creature endowed with enormous strength. Rabbi Judah Loew of Prague,
also know as the Maharal, created him of clay and gave him life by putting a
piece of paper with the secret name of God under his tongue.
The Golem helped the Jews defend themselves against anti-Semitic rioters, but
one day he turned against his creator. He sowed ruin and destruction, until, at
the last moment, the rabbi succeeded in extracting the paper from his mouth. The
Golem turned back into a heap of clay.
Ariel Sharon is not a rabbi, and the Kabbalah is a closed book to him. But he
has created a Golem: the settlement movement in the occupied territories.
He was sure that the Golem would serve him. After all, the settlers owe him
everything. It was Sharon who nursed them for decades, diverted funding to them
on a massive scale, put at their service all the political positions he occupied
one after the other: the leadership of the ministries of agriculture, defense,
foreign affairs, housing, industry and trade, infrastructure and, finally, the
prime minister's office.
Ever since he was the commanding general of the Southern Sector in the early
1970s, he preached to everybody he met, Israelis and foreigners alike, the
gospel of the settlements. According to Sharon, it was vitally important to set
up settlements in order to turn all of Eretz Israel — from the Mediterranean Sea
to the Jordan River, at least — into a Jewish state, to tear the Palestinian
territories into ribbons and prevent the creation of a Palestinian state.
Like a bulldozer without brakes, Sharon leveled all opposition. He saw to it
that tens of billions of dollars were turned over to the settlements, bent the
laws to their benefit and enlisted the officers of the army in their service. In
this way, a closely woven network of settlements and special roads came into
being. When he coined the slogan "unilateral disengagement," when he proposed
pulling up stakes in Gaza and bringing the settlers home, it never occurred to
him that they might oppose him. Don't they owe him? Are they not his children?
Sharon offered them a deal that seemed to him eminently reasonable: Give up the
isolated settlements, with a few thousand settlers, in order to secure the
future of the big settlement blocks, with 80% of the settlers, to be
incorporated into Israel.
Sacrifice some fingers in order to save the whole body. This way not only do we
save the settlement enterprise but we also gain a good part of the West Bank.
But the Golem, once the piece of paper is under his tongue, demonstrates a logic
of his own. He does not intend to give up the dozens of small settlements,
especially as that is where the hard core of Messianic fanatics lives. The Golem
also understood that the evacuation of the first settlement would create a
precedent that would endanger all the others. Like the Maharal, Sharon
underrated his Golem. He treated him as a servant. How could he respect a
creature that he had created with his own hands? Now he is learning that it is
much easier to create a Golem than to reverse the process.
In the surfeit of interviews that Sharon gave last weekend, he declared that the
settlers were only a small minority of the people. And indeed, even according to
the settlers themselves, they constitute less than 4% of the citizens of Israel.
But the numbers do not reflect their actual power. In a democratic society, a
small, fanatical and highly motivated minority can influence matters more than a
big but apathetic and flabby majority.
In the course of the decades, the settlers have set up an extensive apparatus of
control and propaganda. Patiently, they have infiltrated the army, where they
now occupy the key positions once held by kibbutzniks. They possess huge amounts
of funds, not only the money that flows to them through hundreds of channels
from the state coffers, and not only the lavish donations from American Jewish
multimillionaires, but also from the plentiful resources of the American
Christian evangelists hoping for the rebirth of biblical Israel.
One may well ask: What foolishness possessed Sharon when he proposed that the
members of Likud — his own party — of all people, should decide on his plan? Did
he not realize that this is the only arena where the settlers can command
superior forces?
Why? As usual with victory-drunk generals: out of sheer arrogance and contempt
for the opponent. At the pinnacle of political power, he disparaged the
settlers. He underrated their emotional appeal and their well-oiled logistics
machine, created with the money of the state.
Most of the settlers constitute a disciplined body. They unquestioningly obey
their commanders, the "Yesha rabbis" (Yesha is the Hebrew acronym for Judea,
Samaria and Gaza). This is a totalitarian structure, in the true sense of the
term: total faith, total organization, total discipline.
"My head supports the Sharon plan, but my heart supports the settlers," a Likud
member confessed. That is quite natural: When a settler family with attached
baby knocks at the door and asks: "Do you want to evict us from our home?" — how
can he resist? After all, from the day he was born he has heard that the
national aim is to possess the whole of Eretz Israel, that the settlers are the
salt of the Earth.
One good thing has come from this referendum: Suddenly the public has awaked and
seen the Golem that has come to life in their midst. The writing is on the wall:
The settler movement is sucking the marrow from the state; it is an obstacle to
peace; it is a danger to Israeli democracy and to the future of the state
itself. Now the general public, too, sees the danger represented by this
rampaging Golem.
It is not too late to remove the piece of paper from beneath the Golem's tongue.